Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Science for Sale PSA: Radon Mitigation

My husband, son, and I live in a 102-year-old house, one of the first homes to be homesteaded in "West Minneapolis." When we bought the house, it was full of the idiosyncracies of the most recent owners, who really wanted to be living in a cabin in the North Woods. It's been a painstaking task to go room by room and remove century-old wallpaper, patch walls, pull up musty carpet and refinish the original fir floors. By doing a little bit of a time, we've been able to afford small renovations.


And while I was vigilant during the closing process--checked the area for Level 3 sex offenders (didn't stop one from moving in last week, though), for example--my husband and I did not think to have the place tested for radon. Radon is a naturally occuring radioactive gas formed by uranium in the earth's crust. It's odorless, tasteless, colorless. And, unfortunately, it is currently the second-leading cause of lung cancer in the United States. Long story short, radon is found more often in certain parts of the country, and Minnesota is one of those places.


We tested our basement a month ago, hiring a radon tester who does not also have a mitigation company. I feel this is a conflict of interest. This guy was actually a home inspector who specialized in radon testing. The test came back at 8 pico couries/liter (pCi/L). This is frighteningly high. The EPA recommends no long-term radon exposure above 4 pCi/L. Mitigation was a must. We prepared ourselves for a huge expense, but after getting several estimates, we found it wouldn't be more than about $1200 for our particular house. This is not a small chunk of change, basically our entire tax return, but if we'd had to borrow from Payday Loans, we would have. This is not an optional cost. This is necessary.


Yesterday, the guys from the mitigation company came by and installed our system. Unfortunately because our home is old and weird, they couldn't put the fan inside our house, which leaves us open to the possibility of fan freeze should the temp dip to 25 below zero, which it will. Anyway, They drilled a deep hole in the slab of our basement, removing 15-20 gallons of dirt, inserted a PVC pipe, sealed. That pipe was routed to the outside of our home, installed vertically, threaded through our gutter and roof, and routed out of our house, ten feet from any window. A small fan was installed as well. The way these systems work is that by sucking the radon from beneath the slab, the fan then propels it out of the house entirely. Our company guarantees to 2.0 pCi/L or less, so we will test beginning tomorrow.


I tell this story because even today, people don't think to test for radon. Sometimes it's lack of information; sometimes it's fear--what if we have to drop $1,000 to fix this? But for the well-being of your family, I urge you to do this simple test. The benefits so outweigh the costs. I can feel my blood pressure reducing as I type.


If you do choose to mitigate, choose a company that is recommended by your state's Department of Health. Most of them have a list of licensed, bonded companies. That's how we found ours.

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Minnesota Dogfight: Passing the BPA/Phthalate Bills Despite Pawlenty and his ACC Friends

There's a fight going on in the legislative halls of Minnesota right now, thanks to the Herculean efforts of the people at Healthy Legacy. Thank you to Lisa Wolf for this information. As some of you may remember, the Minnesota Legislature took the important step of voting on and passing a bill that would outlaw BPA and phthalates from children's products sold in Minnesota. While the federal government has outlawed phthalates and lead, the FDA has not declared BPA harmful in any way, and so there has been no move to ban it from baby products on a nationwide level. Thankfully, many manufacturers have taken it upon themselves to simply phase it out and eliminate the chemical from their processes altogether. This is because parents and other concerned citizens spoke with their dollars and stopped buying BPA-containing baby bottles, for example. (However, BPA remains in a number of other products, including canned food linings.)


Minnesota citizens didn't want to wait for the federal government, so legislators, under pressure from their constituents, passed this important bill with bipartisan support. Then our governor, Tim Pawlenty, vetoed it. Why? For a long time, it was unclear. But then the other day, Representative Margaret Anderson Kelliher referenced Pawlenty's letter to the legislature explaining his veto. It was chock full of incorrect information and read like an American Chemistry Council press release. NOTE: Lisa Wolf kindly pointed out to me that BPA was no longer on the bill when Pawlenty vetoed it--BPA was taken off the bill in committee because legislators thought it would give it a better chance to pass without it. Phthalates and deca-BDE remained on the bill. And so Pawlenty did not actually veto a BPA-ban.


It is inexcusable and frankly unforgivable that a poltician at Pawlenty's level relies on industry science to make decisions like this. Is it incompetence? Is it collusion? Deviousness? Any of these options are terrifying. So, with this as background, the legislature is gearing up again to reconsider this issue, and this time we need a veto-proof majority. That's where Healthy Legacy is coming in again. The organization has been tireless in rallying around this issue, and has come up with a strategy to make sure the bills (The BPA-Free Baby Products Act and the Toxic Free Kids Act) are passed this time, regardless of Pawlenty's reliance on the ACC's "research" and his own veto power. Below, take a look at these strategies. If you don't live in Minnesota but care about this issue, why not implement some of the strategies yourself, looking up the information for your local representatives, and sending letters. As you can see, municipalities and states across the country are taking it upon themselves to regulate harmful chemicals since the federal government, up to now, has been incapable or unwilling to do so themselves.



Here is our recipe for success:

1. We need massive constituent pressure. If you have any membership, family, or friends in these areas please have them call their legislator as soon as possible. Every call counts!
Folks we need to talk to:

Sen. James Metzen (DFL 39) CHAIR- West St. Paul, Mendota, Inver Grove Heights 651.296.4370http://www.senate.leg.state.mn.us/members/member_bio.php?mem_id=1037&ls=85

Sen. Kathy Saltzman (DFL 56) VICE CHAIR- Woodbury, Lake Elmo, Oak Park Heights 651.296.4166
http://www.senate.leg.state.mn.us/members/member_bio.php?mem_id=1114

Sen. David Tomassoni (DFL 05)- Iron Range 651.296.8017
http://www.senate.leg.state.mn.us/members/member_bio.php?leg_id=10669

Sen. Thom Bakk (DFL 06)-North shore, Grand Marais, Ely, Babbitt, Duluth 651.296.8881
http://www.senate.leg.state.mn.us/members/member_bio.php?leg_id=10027

Sen. Geof Michel (R 41)- Edina 651.296.6238
http://www.senate.leg.state.mn.us/members/member_bio.php?district=41

Sen. Julie Rosen (R 24) Fairmount, Blue Earth 651.296.5713
http://www.senate.leg.state.mn.us/members/member_bio.php?leg_id=10803

Sen. Dan Sparks (DFL 27) Albert Lea, Austin 651.296.9248
http://www.senate.leg.state.mn.us/members/member_bio.php?ls=85&mem_id=1062



2. We will be hosting regular staff and volunteer phonebanks in the next few weeks and I will email out the schedule soon. So, any volunteers or staff that could dedicate some time in the evenings would be great!


3. We will need massive turnout to this committee hearing but alas we don’t have a schedule yet. Another reason to CALL Senator Metzen.


4. Letters to the Editor in any local papers would be phenomenal.


Simple Sample Constituent Phone Call:
Hi Senator________,
My Name is __________ and I am from _____________. I am calling because I am concerned about toxins in children’s products. That is why I am counting on you to support the Toxic Free Kids Act and the BPA Free Baby Products bill. Thank you,

More in-depth call:
Hi Senator_______________,
My Name is __________ and I am from _____________. I am calling because I am concerned about toxins in children’s products. Bisphenol A and other chemicals are turning up in baby bottles, sippy cups, infant formula cans, teething rings and baby’s bath products. Health impacts include diabetes, cancer, hormone disruption and much more. Safer alternatives exist and frankly, we have not met our potential for jobs in Minnesota through the manufacture and sale of safe plastics and green chemistry. That is why I am counting on you to support the Toxic Free Kids Act and the BPA Free Baby Products bill. These bills will phase out harmful toxins from children’s products while opening the door to a new sector of the economy in Minnesota.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

A New Regime

It's been hard to keep up with all the good news since administrations have changed in Washington. I hardly know what to rail against anymore! OK, well maybe the changes have been that dramatic, but let's talk about some huge victories for anyone interested in seeing science free from political interference.


Earlier this week, President Obama released an official memorandum to the Office of Science and Technology Policy directing them to build a strategy to prevent political interference in science. He vowed to make the role of science in the federal government sacrosanct (or at least independent and free from political and industry pressure) by ensuring that "scientific data is never distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda--and that we make scientific decisions based on facts, not ideology."


Some beautiful highlights:


*"Political officials should not suppress or alter scientific or technological findings and conclusions."
*"The selection of scientists and technology professionals for positions in the executive branch should be based on their scientific and technological knowledge, credentials, experience, and integrity."
*"When scientific or technological information is considered in policy decisions, the information should be subject to well-established scientific processes, including peer review where appropriate, and each agency should appropriately and accurately reflect that information in complying with and applying relevant statutory standards"
*Each agency should adopt such additional procedures, including any appropriate whistleblower protections, as are necessary to ensure the integrity of scientific and technological information and processes on which the agency relies in its decisionmaking or otherwise uses or prepares.

I could just go on and on. When dealing with federal officials, it's always best to be guarded, and I will remain so. Industry can be devious and ingenious in the way it worms itself into the process. But after eight years of science being pushed to the side, treated as just another ideology, scientists silenced, their research censored or altered, I find it hard, admittedly, to contain my excitement.


If you're interested in reading this historic document, check it out online here.